Daily Proverbs with Adam Qadmon

Proverbs 16:11 - Breaking the Silence

• Kim & John

Share episode

The gap between witnessing workplace discrimination and speaking up about it is staggering, with 75% of people observing injustice but only 30% raising their voices. We explore the psychological and physiological impacts of staying silent, including the concept of moral injury and how speaking truth aligns with both spiritual wisdom and modern organizational research.

• Workplace discrimination statistics reveal most people stay silent despite witnessing injustice
• Case study of a woman passed over for promotion while a male colleague hired after her advanced
• Women in tech industries experience this scenario 40% more often than men
• Experiencing workplace injustice increases stress hormones by up to 50%
• Moral injury occurs when witnessing injustice but feeling powerless to act
• Companies with strong ethical frameworks see 60% higher employee engagement
• Organizations where employees voice concerns experience 32% lower turnover rates
• Google's Project Aristotle found psychological safety was the top predictor of team success
• Speaking up increases likelihood of others doing the same by 54%
• Acting in alignment with values releases neurochemicals that combat stress
• Most social movements begin with individuals addressing everyday injustices

The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step or, in this case, maybe a single word spoken in the face of injustice.

Proverbs 16:11

Support the show

Genesis 5:2

Speaker 1:

You know what's fascinating about justice? Studies show that 75% of people witness workplace discrimination, but only 30% ever speak up about it. Today we're diving into why that silence exists and what it really costs us.

Speaker 2:

That statistic really hits home, especially when we look at this story about a woman who experienced exactly that kind of situation firsthand. Right, she'd been at her company for five months when something happened.

Speaker 1:

Story about a woman who experienced exactly that kind of situation firsthand Right. She'd been at her company for five months when something happened. That perfectly illustrates why these numbers matter. A male colleague hired four months after her got promoted and received a raise while she was passed over.

Speaker 2:

Even though her performance reviews showed she was exceeding expectations. You know what's interesting Research shows this scenario happens 40% more often to women in tech industries.

Speaker 1:

And her reaction really captures what so many people feel in these situations. She described experiencing this overwhelming rage using this powerful phrase about men getting all the breaks, while women were being treated like slaves.

Speaker 2:

That kind of emotional response actually triggers measurable physiological changes. Studies show experiencing workplace injustice can increase stress hormones by up to 50%.

Speaker 1:

Well, that brings us to this bigger question about action versus inaction. The research shows that people who witness unfairness but don't speak up often experience what psychologists call moral injury.

Speaker 2:

Hmm, that's fascinating. Could you explain more about what moral injury means in this context?

Speaker 1:

So moral injury happens when we witness something that violates our core beliefs about fairness and justice, but we feel powerless to act. It's similar to what soldiers sometimes experience in combat situations.

Speaker 2:

That's such a powerful parallel. It really highlights how deeply these situations can affect us, even if we're just observers.

Speaker 1:

And you know what's really interesting? The reflection we're looking at today actually addresses this exact psychological phenomenon, though it comes at it from a spiritual perspective.

Speaker 2:

Right. It references this ancient proverb about just weight and balance being divine principles. It's like suggesting there's this universal standard for fairness.

Speaker 1:

Exactly, and modern organizational psychology backs this up. Studies show companies with strong ethical frameworks and clear reporting procedures see 60% higher employee engagement.

Speaker 2:

Well, that makes sense. When you consider how much energy it takes to suppress our natural response to injustice, the mental toll of staying silent is actually measurable.

Speaker 1:

Speaking of measurable impacts, let's talk about what happens when people do speak up. A recent Harvard Business Review study found that organizations where employees regularly voice concerns see 32% lower turnover rates.

Speaker 2:

Though I imagine those numbers only apply when the speaking up is met with actual action from leadership.

Speaker 1:

You're absolutely right about that. The same study found that without follow-through, speaking up actually led to increased turnover, as employees lost faith in the system.

Speaker 2:

That reminds me of something called the feedback fallacy, where organizations ask for input but don't create real channels for change.

Speaker 1:

And this is where our reflection takes such an interesting turn. It suggests that speaking up isn't just about getting results. It's about maintaining our own integrity and sense of purpose.

Speaker 2:

That's such an important distinction. It shifts the focus from outcome to principle.

Speaker 1:

Right, and research in positive psychology shows that people who act in alignment with their values report 45% higher life satisfaction, regardless of whether they achieve their immediate goals, regardless of whether they achieve their immediate goals, though I imagine it's still pretty challenging to take that first step, especially when you're facing potential backlash. Well, that's where something called psychological safety comes in. Organizations with high psychological safety scores see nearly three times more innovation and problem solving.

Speaker 2:

And I suppose that's because people feel free to raise issues before they become major problems.

Speaker 1:

Exactly, exactly. There's this fascinating study from Google's Project Aristotle that found psychological safety was the number one predictor of team success, even more important than individual talent.

Speaker 2:

That really connects to the spiritual element in our reflection, doesn't it this idea that speaking truth requires a kind of faith or trust in something bigger than immediate consequences?

Speaker 1:

And the neuroscience backs this up too. When we act in accordance with our values, even in difficult situations, our brains release neurochemicals that help combat stress and anxiety.

Speaker 2:

So in a way, speaking up isn't just good for the organization, it's actually good for our own well-being.

Speaker 1:

The data certainly suggests that. Studies of workplace whistleblowers show that while 76% faced some form of retaliation, 84% said they would do it again because of the psychological benefits of staying true to their values.

Speaker 2:

Though I imagine having support systems in place makes a huge difference.

Speaker 1:

That's where the prayer at the end of our reflection becomes so relevant. It's asking for three things Clarity to see what's wrong. Courage to speak up. And strength to work for change what's wrong.

Speaker 2:

courage to speak up and strength to work for change, and those three elements really map on to what organizational psychologists say we need for effective advocacy.

Speaker 1:

You know what's fascinating? Recent studies show that when one person speaks up about workplace issues, it increases the likelihood of others speaking up by 54%.

Speaker 2:

That ripple effect can really transform an organization's culture.

Speaker 1:

And it goes beyond just the workplace. Historical analysis shows that most major social changes started with small groups of people willing to speak up about everyday injustices.

Speaker 2:

So maybe that's the real takeaway here that speaking up isn't just about fixing immediate problems. It's about being part of a larger movement toward justice.

Speaker 1:

Well, the research certainly supports that. Studies of successful social movements show they typically start with individuals addressing local issues before connecting to broader systemic changes.

Speaker 2:

That really brings it full circle to our original story, doesn't it? One woman's experience of workplace inequality connecting to these universal principles of justice.

Speaker 1:

And perhaps that's the most important insight that our personal experiences of injustice aren't just individual grievances. They're often symptoms of larger systemic issues that need addressing.

Speaker 2:

Well, that's certainly given me a lot to think about regarding times I've stayed silent.

Speaker 1:

You know what they say the journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step or, in this case, maybe a single word spoken in the face of injustice.